IP News
IP News

FinFET patent infringement case between KIP (KAIST-affiliated company) and Samsung Electronics

AJU KIM CHANG LEE|April 14, 2020
FinFET patent infringement case between KIP (KAIST-affiliated company) and Samsung Electronics

Last February, the US District Court of the Eastern District of Texas issued a decision requiring Samsung Electronics to pay USD 200 million in compensation for deliberate infringement of technology held by KIP Co., Ltd.

AJU KIM CHANG LEE

Figure 01 / 02

FinFET Patent Dispute

  1. 2001

    FinFET patent invented

    Double-gate FinFET invented by Prof. Lee Jong-Ho at Seoul National University

  2. Post-invention

    Patents granted in Korea & US

    KIP (KAIST affiliate) acquired and managed the patents; Intel and Apple paid royalties

  3. Dispute period

    Samsung refused agreement

    Prof. Lee provided Samsung explanations and continuously requested a royalty agreement; Samsung never agreed

  4. February (prior year)

    US District Court ruling

    Eastern District of Texas: Samsung ordered to pay USD 200M for deliberate infringement

  5. Pending

    Samsung appeal ongoing

    Samsung appealed; PTAB reexamination pending with invalidity opinion from Examination Bureau

KIP (KAIST affiliate) vs. Samsung Electronics — US litigation timeline

Figure 02 / 02

FinFET Case Key Facts

01

USD 200M

Damages ordered

US District Court, Eastern District of Texas

02

2001

Year of invention

Prof. Lee Jong-Ho, Seoul National University

03

2

Invalidation actions dismissed

Samsung's challenges at PTAB and KIPO both rejected

KIP vs. Samsung Electronics patent infringement verdict

TopicsIP News

Executive Summary

Last February, the US District Court of the Eastern District of Texas issued a decision requiring Samsung Electronics to pay USD 200 million in compensation for deliberate infringement of technology held by KIP Co., Ltd.

The corresponding technology relates to a double-gate FinFET that was invented by Professor Lee Jong-Ho (Seoul National University) in 2001, and patents for it were granted in Korea and the US. Intel and Apple, both of which use the technology, have paid royalties according to agreements with KIP, and the relevant technology has been owned and managed by KIP, a KAIST affiliate specializing in patents.

While Professor Lee provided Samsung Electronics with an explanation of the patented technology and continuously requested a royalty agreement, Samsung Electronics never agreed. The court concluded that Samsung Electronics merely listened to Lee’s explanation of the technology, and deliberately infringed the patent without paying royalties.

Samsung Electronics plans to appeal to receive acknowledgement that the technology belongs to Samsung Electronics. A reexamination request has been filed with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and the appeal hearing is currently pending.

In this regard, two invalidation actions against the patent at issue were lodged by Samsung Electronics with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, but were dismissed. Also, invalidation actions filed with the KIPO were dismissed as well, and thus the chances of success in invalidation of the patent are estimated to be low. However, in the pending reexamination, the Examination Bureau has determined an invalidity opinion, and when the patent is finally determined, the determination will have an influence on the infringement action, and thus the development of the final decision is being watched with keen interest.

Published

April 14, 2020 · AJU KIM CHANG LEE

Back to IP News